BACK LAWSUIT 6'?m3f Salvation, trinity, deity of Jesus, cults (scene: a courtroom or bare stage with podium) JUDGE -- (enters wearing black robe, crosses to bench, pounds gavel) This court will come to order. Our next civil suit is.... (reads, pauses) Am I reading this right? All non-Christian cults versus the entire Christian church? PLAINTIFF -- (enters, wearing business suit, carrying file folder, crossing to Judge) That's right, Your Honor. For two thousand years the Christian Church has perpetrated a fraud against humanity and my clients, the non-Christian cults, intend to put a stop to it. JUDGE -- And whom do we have representing the entire Christian Church? KID -- (enters wearing pigtails and childish clothes) Brittany Williams for the defense, Your Honor. But you can call me punky. PLAINTIFF -- What is this, some kind of joke? JUDGE -- What is this, some kind of joke? KID -- Not at all, Your Honor. My dad was scheduled as defense counsel and he said a child could defend the Christian position. So, here I am! PLAINTIFF -- Your Honor, this is obviously a ploy so that Christians will have grounds for appeal on the grounds of inadequate counsel. JUDGE -- This IS highly unusual! KID -- The court may rest assured, Your Honor. (removes paper from folder, offers it to Judge) My client hereby waives its right to subsequent appeal. JUDGE -- (scans paper) So it says. Well, it looks like the plaintiffs won't have to worry about an appeal, Counselor. PLAINTIFF -- This is obviously a publicity stunt to garner public opinion in the press. JUDGE -- Is that true? KID -- Not at all, Your Honor. My Dad merely wants to emphasize that the Lord Always puts the goodies on the bottom shelf so that everyone can reach them. If the church's arguments can't be understood by children, we're doing something wrong. JUDGE -- Very well. Proceed with your opening arguments, Counselor. PLAINTIFF -- Thank you, Your Honor. In light of defense counsel's appeal to simple arguments, I to will put the goodies on the bottom shelf so that everyone can reach them. My clients have two basic arguments to support our allegations of fraud by the Christian Church: The first is from the Bible itself, Ephesians 2:8 "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith--and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God--" JUDGE -- And how does that imply fraud by the Christian Church? PLAINTIFF -- The Christian Church alleges that salvation is a gift of God. If I tell you I'm giving you a gift of money, but I take the money from someone else's wallet, that's not a gift, it's theft. JUDGE -- And how do you allege that God stole the gift of salvation? PLAINTIFF -- That brings us to the second of our two basic arguments: the gift spoken of in this passage is the death of one person to pay for the sins of others. Now, if I'm God and I say I love you so much that I'm willing to give a life to save yours, on the surface that sounds like a really loving thing to do... until you find out that the one who's giving the gift is not the one doing the dying. How loving is that?! One could even say that taking the life of another is murder! JUDGE -- And now, Defense Counsel will present its opening arguments. Punky? KID -- Frankly, Your Honor, the Plaintiff's arguments are specious. PLAINTIFF -- Specious?! KID -- That means they're lame. PLAINTIFF -- I know what specious means! JUDGE -- You'll have your chance at cross-examination later, Counselor. PLAINTIFF -- Sorry, Your Honor. JUDGE -- Continue. KID -- Thank you, Your Honor. I will admit that part of what the plaintiff alleges is true. PLAINTIFF -- It is?! I mean, of course it is! JUDGE -- (raises gavel) PLAINTIFF -- Sorry. Please continue. KID -- If the gift of God is what the plaintiffs say it is, it wouldn't be much of a gift. It's not terribly loving to give a gift at someone else's expense, especially when the gift means someone dies. At best, that gift could be considered as no gift at all. At worst, if the person gave his life unwillingly, you could call it murder. PLAINTIFF -- (pumps hand, whispers) Yes! (regains composure as Judge turns) KID -- If I received a gift like that, I wouldn't feel loved at all. I might even think that the gift wasn't good enough to really pay for my sins. I would think that I would still have some work to do to buy my own salvation as the non-Christian cults believe. PLAINTIFF -- Your Honor, in light of Defense Counsel's admissions, I move for summary judgement. JUDGE -- I don't think Defense Counsel is finished with her opening arguments. PLAINTIFF -- Oh. JUDGE -- Motion Denied. Please continue. KID -- My client, the Christian Church argues that it was God himself who died for the sins of the people. And there is no greater gift, no greater love than to lay down one's own life for his friends. (pulls several papers from folder, offers to Judge) To wit, we hereby submit Defense Exhibit A: a sworn statement by the Prophet Isaiah who quotes God as calling himself the savior. And Exhibit B, a sworn statement from Jude, a writer of the New Testament makes the same claim. Both exhibits state unequivocally that there is no savior but God himself. PLAINTIFF -- (reaches) Let me see that! That can't be! KID -- We also submit Defense Exhibit C, a sworn statement by Apostle Paul that states unequivocally that Jesus is God, the Creator of the Universe. PLAINTIFF -- That can't be! KID -- We also submit Defense Exhibit D, a sworn statement by Apostle Peter that states unequivocally that Jesus is God over all. JUDGE -- Rebuttal, Counselor? PLAINTIFF -- (scans papers) Well, there it is in black and white! How could my clients have missed this! This is impossible! My clients allege that Jesus was an angel, perhaps an archangel or the spirit brother of Satan himself. KID -- Can the plaintiffs submit exhibits from the Bible supporting such a notion? Clear, unequivocal scriptures that you find on the bottom shelf? PLAINTIFF -- Well, no. KID -- Your Honor, as the defense exhibits clearly show, the life given for the sins of others was indeed the life of the giver himself, and therefore a true gift of love. I rest my case. JUDGE -- Is there any evidence from Plaintiff Counsel? PLAINTIFF -- Well, no. But they sounded so convincing. They're such nice people. JUDGE -- Very well, noting a distinct lack of evidence for plaintiffs position and a preponderance of evidence for the contrary, I hereby find for the defense. This case is dismissed. (exits) PLAINTIFF -- (exiting with Kid) Hey, kid, you did pretty good for your first day in court. KID -- It was Kid's stuff. ©2007 Bob Snook. Conditions for use: Do not sell any part of this script, even if you rewrite it. Pay no royalties, even if you make money from performances. You may reproduce and distribute this script freely, but all copies must contain this copyright statement. http://www.fea.net/bobsnook email: bobsnook@fea.net BACK |